1d:I[70616,["/_next/static/chunks/0kcf5dt6yxdox.js","/_next/static/chunks/1su5n1uv1ti4s.js","/_next/static/chunks/0gvke1wv6udfg.js","/_next/static/chunks/1dfrle3jgmlzh.js","/_next/static/chunks/162lgvduyr-fa.js","/_next/static/chunks/2gcnnopam8e9w.js","/_next/static/chunks/2g60iab5a1pkg.js"],"Breadcrumb"] 1e:I[90762,["/_next/static/chunks/0kcf5dt6yxdox.js","/_next/static/chunks/1su5n1uv1ti4s.js","/_next/static/chunks/0gvke1wv6udfg.js","/_next/static/chunks/1dfrle3jgmlzh.js","/_next/static/chunks/162lgvduyr-fa.js","/_next/static/chunks/2gcnnopam8e9w.js","/_next/static/chunks/2g60iab5a1pkg.js"],"ArticleGrid"] 1f:T1943,

Newly unsealed material in the copyright suit The New York Times brought against OpenAI and Microsoft nearly three years ago contains something the companies' public filings never have: their own people describing the practice in the plainest possible terms. In a January 2023 internal memo, Microsoft's director of Applied Science, Brent Hecht, called AI training on scraped work "an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions" and "the largest theft of labor in human history." The quotes surfaced Thursday and were first reported by TechCrunch.

One caveat frames everything below. Most of the newly visible language comes from the plaintiffs' own brief rather than the underlying exhibits, which remain sealed, so the excerpts arrive stripped of the context in which they were written. The allegations have not been tested at trial.

Key takeaways

A January 2023 Microsoft memo described AI training on scraped content as the largest theft of labor in human history, according to the unsealed brief.
Microsoft's own data allegedly showed Copilot cutting click-throughs to nytimes.com by as much as 93% versus traditional Bing search, which an internal presentation called a "doom loop."
The brief alleges OpenAI's mid-training datasets held more than 91,692 copies of works from the three news plaintiffs, and a separate joint dataset at least 160,903 unique works.

Why the internal language matters legally

Courts have generally been receptive to the argument that training a model on copyrighted text is fair use, and the Trump administration filed a brief earlier this month supporting OpenAI's unlicensed use of copyrighted material. Fair use, however, turns partly on whether the new product substitutes for the original in the market — and that is precisely where the unsealed statements cut against the defense.

OpenAI's head of ChatGPT, Nick Turley, is quoted describing an existential threat to publishers from products that are largely substitutive and, in his framing, will only become more so as they improve. President Greg Brockman is quoted calling the models excellent at news. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella agreed under oath that talking to a chatbot supplies the information on the AI platform instead of sending a reader to the underlying source. None of that reads as transformation; it reads as replacement.

The traffic numbers attached to the filing sharpen the point. Microsoft's internal measurements allegedly showed that its Copilot answer engine reduced click-through rates for the Times' domain by as much as 93% compared with ordinary Bing search. A January 2024 presentation by Hecht described the dynamic as a doom loop that would damage both the models and the wider web at once.

It is highly unusual that an end-product threatens the economic foundations of its essential suppliers, but that is the situation we have created for our LLM business with respect to its "content supply chain."

The scale and the shortcuts

The brief also puts numbers on the copying. It alleges that OpenAI's mid-training datasets alone hold more than 91,692 copies of works from the Times, the New York Daily News and the Center for Investigative Reporting, and that a Common Crawl-derived dataset contained upward of two million documents from nytimes.com. Data moved in both directions between the partners: OpenAI is said to have handed Microsoft the entire GPT-3 training set, while Microsoft supplied data through efforts named Project Taxi and Project Mango. The Mango dataset allegedly assembled at least 160,903 unique works from the news plaintiffs.

Some of the most damaging passages concern intent rather than volume. The filing describes OpenAI staff discussing a method to get past the Times' paywall without detection — researcher Nick Ryder raising it and Brockman responding approvingly — and alleges that copyright notices were deliberately stripped from training data so models would not reproduce them. Nadella testified that paywalled material should be licensed by anyone using it for training or grounding, and said that had he known OpenAI scraped behind paywalls, he would have invoked Microsoft's right to demand the models be retrained.

What happens next

Counsel for the New York Daily News said the evidence shows for the first time that both companies knew the practice was wrong. Neither Microsoft nor OpenAI responded to requests for comment. Whether the quotes survive contact with their sealed context is the question that will decide how much they are worth, and the exhibits themselves are still under seal.

The disclosure lands as the industry negotiates the same problem in public through consent standards rather than litigation — Microsoft among the companies that recently signed on to Cloudflare's crawler rules. What the filing adds is evidence that the economics of web scraping for large language models were understood internally, and described in unflattering terms, years before the public argument began.

FAQ

What exactly was unsealed?

Unredacted portions of a legal brief filed by The New York Times in its copyright case against OpenAI and Microsoft, which quotes internal memos, presentations and depositions. The underlying exhibits those quotes come from remain sealed, so the excerpts appear without their original context.

Does this settle the fair use question?

No. Judges have largely accepted that model training can qualify as fair use, and the case has not gone to trial. The unsealed statements matter because fair use weighs whether a product substitutes for the original work, and several quoted executives describe exactly that kind of substitution.

Have Microsoft and OpenAI responded?

Neither company returned requests for comment on the unsealed material. The allegations in the brief are the plaintiffs' characterization of the evidence and have not been adjudicated.

a:["$","div",null,{"className":"mx-auto max-w-7xl px-4 py-8 sm:px-6","children":[["$","script",null,{"type":"application/ld+json","dangerouslySetInnerHTML":{"__html":"{\"@context\":\"https://schema.org\",\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https://ainewsway.com\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"#new-york-times\",\"item\":\"https://ainewsway.com/tag/new-york-times\"}]}"}}],["$","script",null,{"type":"application/ld+json","dangerouslySetInnerHTML":{"__html":"{\"@context\":\"https://schema.org\",\"@type\":\"ItemList\",\"@id\":\"https://ainewsway.com/tag/new-york-times#itemlist\",\"name\":\"#new-york-times Articles\",\"numberOfItems\":1,\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"url\":\"https://ainewsway.com/articles/a-microsoft-memo-called-ai-training-the-largest-theft-of-labor-in-human-history-mu69lbru\",\"name\":\"A Microsoft Memo Called AI Training 'the Largest Theft of Labor in Human History'\"}]}"}}],["$","$L1d",null,{"items":[{"label":"# new-york-times"}]}],["$","h1",null,{"className":"mb-8 text-3xl font-bold text-zinc-900 dark:text-zinc-100","children":["#","new-york-times"]}],[["$","$L1e",null,{"articles":[{"id":"900afa41-32cc-41d2-9d62-545d1bfbc246","slug":"a-microsoft-memo-called-ai-training-the-largest-theft-of-labor-in-human-history-mu69lbru","title":"A Microsoft Memo Called AI Training 'the Largest Theft of Labor in Human History'","subtitle":"Unsealed material in the New York Times case puts internal Microsoft and OpenAI candor about paywalls, substitution and publisher harm on the record","content":"$1f","excerpt":"Unsealed material in the NYT case quotes a Microsoft memo calling AI training the largest theft of labor in human history, plus traffic and dataset figures.","coverImage":"https://cdn.ainewsway.com/uploads/2026/09/22ee57ed-90d8-4d7f-a0b6-64dbb4f144ad.webp","coverImageCaption":"The New York Times copyright case against OpenAI and Microsoft has entered its third year, with newly unsealed filings quoting internal company documents.","authorId":"6773f67d-d7fa-4b19-8f38-384f10ac761b","status":"PUBLISHED","publishedAt":"2026-09-18T01:13:35.081Z","viewCount":0,"likeCount":0,"readingTime":5,"isFeatured":false,"isBreakingNews":false,"metaTitle":"Unsealed NYT Filing Exposes Microsoft's AI 'Theft' Memo","metaDescription":"A January 2023 Microsoft memo called AI training the largest theft of labor in human history, per unsealed filings in the New York Times copyright case.","metaKeywords":["New York Times lawsuit","OpenAI copyright","Microsoft","AI training data","fair use","web scraping","publisher traffic"],"ogImage":null,"aiSummary":"Unsealed portions of The New York Times' brief against OpenAI and Microsoft quote a January 2023 Microsoft memo calling AI training on scraped work the largest theft of labor in human history. The filing also alleges Copilot cut click-throughs to nytimes.com by up to 93%, that OpenAI datasets held more than 91,692 copies of the plaintiffs' works, and that staff discussed bypassing paywalls. The underlying exhibits remain sealed.","aiTags":[],"sentiment":null,"articleType":"NEWS","videoEmbed":null,"videoType":null,"seoScore":85,"isAutoGenerated":true,"isBackfill":false,"pipelineStage":null,"copyrightScore":null,"similarityScore":null,"matchedSourceId":null,"createdAt":"2026-09-18T01:13:08.828Z","updatedAt":"2026-09-18T03:06:04.557Z","contentUpdatedAt":"2026-09-18T03:06:04.556Z","deletedAt":null,"author":{"id":"6773f67d-d7fa-4b19-8f38-384f10ac761b","name":"Seung Jung","username":"Seung Jung","avatar":null},"categories":[{"id":"8126f4b3-ce4a-464f-bc70-7c3c39d5540b","name":"Tech & Business","slug":"tech-business"}],"tags":[{"id":"ca8e24a6-cbd4-4bba-a596-bf5bbdafb5aa","name":"Microsoft","slug":"microsoft"},{"id":"95546cf6-8b8e-4ec4-829b-f9988ab8674c","name":"OpenAI","slug":"openai"},{"id":"830e6eac-309f-4b58-bf5d-0eaadfb1fe3c","name":"AI Regulation","slug":"ai-regulation"},{"id":"6f581301-f37a-4098-9479-4dbaab33c06b","name":"Copyright","slug":"copyright"},{"id":"29ea0ec7-1c13-4084-927e-0db97b34c2ab","name":"New York Times","slug":"new-york-times"}],"translations":[{"id":"9eca1580-f530-46d0-9099-76e516d203c5","language":"es","title":"Un memo de Microsoft llamó al entrenamiento de IA “el mayor robo de trabajo de la historia”","subtitle":"El material desclasificado en el caso del New York Times deja por escrito la franqueza interna de Microsoft y OpenAI sobre muros de pago, sustitución y daño a los medios","excerpt":"El material desclasificado en el caso del NYT cita un memo de Microsoft que llama al entrenamiento de IA el mayor robo de trabajo de la historia, con cifras de tráfico y datasets.","metaTitle":"Escrito del NYT revela el memo del “robo” de Microsoft","metaDescription":"Un memo interno de Microsoft de enero de 2023 calificó el entrenamiento de IA como el mayor robo de trabajo de la historia, según escritos desclasificados del caso del NYT."},{"id":"6df1474a-2c3e-4c5a-b330-2340d7a6ec31","language":"ja","title":"Microsoft社内メモ、AI学習を「人類史上最大の労働の窃盗」と表現","subtitle":"ニューヨーク・タイムズの訴訟で開示された資料が、ペイウォールや代替性、報道機関への打撃をめぐるMicrosoftとOpenAI内部の率直な発言を記録に残した","excerpt":"NYT訴訟で開示された資料には、AI学習を人類史上最大の労働の窃盗と呼んだMicrosoftのメモや、トラフィックとデータセットの数値が含まれます。","metaTitle":"開示されたNYT書面、Microsoftの「窃盗」メモが明らかに","metaDescription":"2023年1月のMicrosoft社内メモがAI学習を人類史上最大の労働の窃盗と表現。ニューヨーク・タイムズの著作権訴訟で開示された書面で明らかになりました。"},{"id":"a048ee3b-ff17-4b27-8066-04b65a6fec89","language":"ko","title":"Microsoft 내부 메모 \"AI 학습은 인류 역사상 최대의 노동 절도\"","subtitle":"뉴욕타임스 소송에서 봉인이 풀린 자료가 페이월·대체 효과·언론사 피해를 둘러싼 Microsoft와 OpenAI 내부의 솔직한 발언을 기록으로 남겼다","excerpt":"NYT 소송에서 공개된 자료에 AI 학습을 인류 역사상 최대의 노동 절도라 부른 Microsoft 메모와 트래픽·데이터셋 수치가 담겼다.","metaTitle":"봉인 풀린 NYT 서면, Microsoft의 'AI 절도' 메모","metaDescription":"2023년 1월 Microsoft 내부 메모가 AI 학습을 인류 역사상 최대의 노동 절도로 규정했다. 뉴욕타임스 저작권 소송에서 봉인이 풀린 서면에 담긴 내용이다."},{"id":"09d794ab-4d88-429d-941c-7b37c336ad0a","language":"zh","title":"微軟內部備忘錄：AI 訓練是「人類史上最大規模的勞動竊取」","subtitle":"《紐約時報》訴訟解封的文件，把微軟與 OpenAI 內部對付費牆、替代效應與媒體損害的坦白說法留在紀錄上","excerpt":"《紐約時報》訴訟解封的文件引用微軟備忘錄，稱 AI 訓練是人類史上最大規模的勞動竊取，並附上流量與資料集數字。","metaTitle":"紐時訴訟解封文件曝光微軟「竊取」備忘錄","metaDescription":"2023 年 1 月的微軟內部備忘錄把 AI 訓練稱為人類史上最大規模的勞動竊取，內容出自《紐約時報》著作權訴訟解封的書狀。"}],"celebrities":[{"id":"b4b2327a-471f-4dbc-a85f-a9c29f3ddd82","nameKo":"마이크로소프트","nameEn":"Microsoft","slug":"microsoft","profileImage":null},{"id":"b086135e-3126-46cd-b591-67f073dff1bb","nameKo":"OpenAI","nameEn":"OpenAI","slug":"openai","profileImage":"https://ui-avatars.com/api/?name=OpenAI&size=400&background=F97316&color=fff&bold=true"},{"id":"a23eead5-950a-4398-a6a9-87cc785ac6e2","nameKo":"사티아 나델라","nameEn":"Satya Nadella","slug":"satya-nadella","profileImage":"https://ui-avatars.com/api/?name=Satya+Nadella&size=400&background=10B981&color=fff&bold=true"}]}]}],"$L20"]]}]

#new-york-times

Un memo de Microsoft llamó al entrenamiento de IA “el mayor robo de trabajo de la historia”

Suscríbete al Boletín

#new-york-times

Un memo de Microsoft llamó al entrenamiento de IA “el mayor robo de trabajo de la historia”