AI Newsway

Mercury 2.5 Ships at 1,107 Tokens a Second and Four Cents a Million

Inception Labs is selling throughput, not intelligence β€” and customers in voice and coding agents are buying it

|5 min read0
AI Summary
Inception Labs released Mercury 2.5, which it describes as the largest diffusion language model ever trained, running at 1,107 tokens per second on widely available NVIDIA GPUs. It lists at $0.20 per million input and $0.75 per million output tokens, discounted 80% at launch, with a claimed 40% intelligence gain over Mercury 2. The pitch is throughput for agent pipelines: Augment Code cut context compaction from 150 seconds to 27 and costs by 90%.
GPU racks in a research data centre β€” Inception Labs says Mercury 2.5 reaches 1,107 tokens per second on widely available NVIDIA hardware rather than specialised inference silicon.
GPU racks in a research data centre β€” Inception Labs says Mercury 2.5 reaches 1,107 tokens per second on widely available NVIDIA hardware rather than specialised inference silicon.

Inception Labs is making an unusual pitch with Mercury 2.5: not a smarter model, but one fast and cheap enough to be called dozens of times inside a single user interaction. The startup says it is the largest diffusion language model ever trained, clocks 1,107 tokens per second on widely available NVIDIA GPUs, and lists at $0.20 and $0.75 per million input and output tokens β€” discounted 80%, to $0.04 and $0.15, at launch.

Key takeaways

  • Mercury 2.5 delivers a claimed 40% intelligence gain over Mercury 2 while keeping the same low-latency, low-cost serving profile.
  • Inception positions its quality against cost-optimised frontier tiers β€” GPT-5.6 Luna (Low), Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Claude Haiku 4.5 β€” rather than against flagship reasoning models.
  • Augment Code reports that moving context compaction to Mercury cut latency 82%, from roughly 150 seconds to 27 seconds, and reduced cost by 90%.

Why a diffusion LLM competes on latency

Conventional large language models emit one token after another, so wall-clock time scales with how much they say. Diffusion models refine a whole block of text across parallel passes instead, and that architectural difference is why Inception Labs can quote four-digit throughput on commodity accelerators rather than on specialised inference silicon.

The company frames Mercury 2.5 as the first output of a feedback loop rather than a benchmark push: usage grew more than an order of magnitude after Mercury 2 shipped, across thousands of developers and dozens of enterprise deployments, and Inception says it rebuilt its evaluations around the production failure cases that growth exposed before starting training.

Where customers are running it

Search shows why per-call latency compounds. One query can fan out into dozens of model invocations β€” planning, query rewriting, reranking, fact structuring, summarisation, answer checking β€” and the whole chain has to finish before the user notices a pause, which is why Inception says several leading search-infrastructure companies now run Mercury in production.

Voice agents are the harder constraint, because latency there is audible as dead air on a phone call. OpenCall, which builds AI phone agents for live customer conversations, measures median model response latency near 170 milliseconds on its production workload, and co-founder and CEO Oliver Silverstein says the switch cut the company's P99 from several minutes to one second and its P50 from 0.4 seconds to under 0.2:

significantly faster than any other provider we've seen, and that's including reasoning.

Coding agents present the third pattern, and the numbers there are the most concrete in the announcement. Augment Code moved context compaction onto Mercury and watched it drop from roughly 150 seconds to 27 β€” an 82% cut β€” while costing 90% less at what the company says is unchanged quality, with MCP tool-search summaries returning in under a second.

Two previews aimed at the latency floor

Mercury Voice, previewed alongside the main release, is a dLLM tuned for the tightest budgets in spoken interaction, with time-to-first-token under 170 milliseconds. A second preview, Mercury Router, uses a diffusion model to read an incoming prompt and pick a downstream model, open or closed, on quality-speed-cost grounds.

Shruti Koparkar, a senior product manager in NVIDIA's Accelerated Computing Group, read the release as a marker of how quickly a new architecture can harden into production-ready systems on existing AI infrastructure. That framing is the real claim here: diffusion for text has spent years as a research curiosity, and speed numbers alone have not moved buyers before β€” OpenAI's own ultrafast tier leaned on Cerebras silicon to get a comparable jump, where Inception is claiming the gain comes from the architecture rather than the hardware.

Availability and what comes next

Mercury 2.5 serves through the Inception API, Baseten and OpenRouter, with 100 million free tokens for new API users and enterprise options covering dedicated capacity, autoscaling, compliance controls and configurable data retention. Tunable reasoning, parallel tool calls and schema-aligned JSON round out the feature set, the last mattering for agent pipelines that depend on structured output.

A successor is already in training. Inception describes it as its largest model yet, targeted for release within months, and says the goal is a capability leap that does not surrender diffusion's speed or token efficiency.

FAQ

How much does Mercury 2.5 cost?

List pricing is $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens. At launch Inception is discounting that by 80%, to $0.04 per million input and $0.15 per million output. New API users also get 100 million free tokens.

Is Mercury 2.5 open source?

No. Mercury 2.5 is a proprietary hosted model served through the Inception API, Baseten and OpenRouter. Enterprise customers can get dedicated capacity and configurable data retention, but the weights are not published.

What is a diffusion LLM?

A diffusion language model generates text by iteratively refining a block of tokens in parallel rather than predicting them strictly left to right. The approach trades architectural familiarity for throughput, which is why it is aimed at latency-sensitive work such as voice agents, search pipelines and agent scaffolding.

How do you feel about this article?

SJ

Discussion

Sign in to post
Loading...

Related articles

GLM-5.3 Scores 60 on Artificial Analysis Index at Half the Usual Output Price
LLM & Chatbots

GLM-5.3 Scores 60 on Artificial Analysis Index at Half the Usual Output Price

Artificial Analysis scored Z.ai's GLM-5.3 at 60 on its Intelligence Index, well above the 35 median, at $4.40 per million output tokens. The catch is verbosity.

Seung Jung29 days ago
Grok 4.6 Reaches the AI Frontier Without Raising Its Price
LLM & Chatbots

Grok 4.6 Reaches the AI Frontier Without Raising Its Price

xAI's Grok 4.6 scores 61 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, matching GPT-5.6 Sol while holding pricing flat at $2/$6 per million tokens.

Seung Jung34 days ago
Gemini 3.7 Flash Arrives Three Weeks After 3.6 - At Half the Price
LLM & Chatbots

Gemini 3.7 Flash Arrives Three Weeks After 3.6 - At Half the Price

Google's Gemini 3.7 Flash lands three weeks after 3.6 Flash, scoring 65.3% on DeepSWE and shipping at half the price through the end of 2026.

Seung Jung34 days ago
DeepSeek V4 Pro Hits General Availability at a Fraction of Frontier Pricing
LLM & Chatbots

DeepSeek V4 Pro Hits General Availability at a Fraction of Frontier Pricing

DeepSeek has moved its V4 Pro model to general availability, and the release is drawing attention less for raw capability than for what that capability now cost...

Seung Jung34 days ago
Ox Alpha Unmasked: Z.ai Ships GLM-5.3-Flash With MIT Weights and 15-Cent Pricing
LLM & Chatbots

Ox Alpha Unmasked: Z.ai Ships GLM-5.3-Flash With MIT Weights and 15-Cent Pricing

Z.ai confirmed the stealth Ox Alpha model is GLM-5.3-Flash: 320B parameters, 18B active, MIT-licensed weights and sub-dollar output pricing.

Seung Jung20 days ago
Qwen3.8 Max Tops Artificial Analysis Agentic Index, Outranking Every US Lab but Two
LLM & Chatbots

Qwen3.8 Max Tops Artificial Analysis Agentic Index, Outranking Every US Lab but Two

Alibaba's Qwen3.8 Max leads the Artificial Analysis agentic index, winning through long-horizon persistence rather than top reasoning scores.

Seung Jung41 days ago